Skip to main content

For the treatment of pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD; WHO Group 3) to improve exercise ability.

FOR US HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS ONLY

Request a Rep Referral Form
Skip to main content
Referral Form

SAFETY

WHY TYVASO?
SO you can offer your patients a well-tolerated treatment for PH-ILD2

Most frequently occurring adverse events (>10% in either group)2

Adverse Event
Treatment n (%)

TYVASO (n=163)
Placebo (n=163)

Cough
71 (43.6)
54 (33.1)

Headache
45 (27.6)
32 (19.6)

Dyspnea
41 (25.2)
51 (31.3)

Dizziness
30 (18.4)
23 (14.1)

Nausea
25 (15.3)
26 (16.0)

Fatigue
23 (14.1)
23 (14.1)

Diarrhea
22 (13.5)
19 (11.7)

Throat irritation
20 (12.3)
6 (3.7)

Oropharyngeal pain
18 (11.0)
4 (2.5)

Discontinuation rates due to an AE were similar for TYVASO and placebo at 9.8% and 8.0%, respectively.1

SAFETY ENDPOINTS

Below is a post hoc analysis of data from a prespecified safety endpoint. Interpret with appropriate caution. The clinical significance of differences in FVC is unknown.

Impact on lung function in patients taking TYVASO compared with placebo3

  • FVC for patients in overall population3*

  • FVC for patients with an IPF etiology1,4†

In the overall population, TYVASO resulted in a placebo-corrected difference in FVC of 44.4 mL at week 163
INCREASE trial improved lung function data vs placebo in overall population

Based on a concern that treating WHO Group 3 pulmonary hypertension with pulmonary vasodilators could worsen V/Q matching in patients, PFTs (including FVC) and exacerbations were included as safety endpoints due to the potential risk of V/Q mismatch.5

*LS mean (SE) and estimated difference (SE) are from the MMRM with the change from baseline in FVC as the dependent variable; treatment, week, and treatment-by-week interaction as the fixed effects; baseline FVC as the covariate; and patient as the random effect. An unstructured variance/covariance structure shared across treatment groups was used to model the within-patient errors.3

During the 16-week study, fewer patients in the TYVASO group had exacerbations of underlying lung disease4‡

Overall, 43 patients (26%) in the TYVASO group experienced an exacerbation of underlying lung disease during the study compared with 63 patients (39%) in the placebo group4‡

Number of patients who experienced an exacerbation4
Time to exacerbation of underlying lung disease data from INCREASE trial

There was no evidence that TYVASO, an inhaled vasodilator therapy, worsened oxygenation, suggesting it does not contribute to the undesirable effects of V/Q mismatching.2

Exacerbation was defined as an acute, clinically significant respiratory deterioration characterized by evidence of new widespread alveolar abnormality determined by the investigator.1

AE=adverse event; FVC=forced vital capacity; IPF=idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; LS=least squares; MMRM=mixed-effect model repeat measurement; PFT=pulmonary function test; PH-ILD=pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease; SE=standard error; V/Q=ventilation/perfusion; WHO=World Health Organization.